Sign up with your email address to be the first to know about new products, VIP offers, blog features & more.
4 Responses
  • Tim Ferguson
    February 10, 2014

    Haven't read it yet. But my first thought is: How confusing will this be for most people?

  • Goran Arvidson
    February 10, 2014

    +Tim Ferguson Well. Most people just use JPEG anyway, it´ll just be an improvement. Don´t you think?

  • Tim Ferguson
    February 10, 2014

    I foresee people not really understanding the difference between lossless and lossy and having the same file extension only adds to this confusion. (Or will it come with a different file extension?)

    But I'm all for the idea of camera manufacturers using this instead of propriety RAW formats!

  • IOOI SqAR
    February 10, 2014

    Why such a half assed "solution" again? Why don't they extend it to 16 bit per channel right away?

Leave a Reply